Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldOakwood ward26/00675/HOU
Planning application · Enfield

26/00675/HOU.

21 Merrivale London N14 4TE

Householder at 21 Merrivale London N14 4TE, received 23 Feb 2026 — refused on 29 Apr 2026 (delegated, Jennie Rebairo).

EnfieldOakwoodN14 4TE26/00675/HOU
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Apr 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
23
Documents
23 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension, two storey side extension and conversion of garage to habitable room with replacement of garage door.

Reference
26/00675/HOU
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 4TE
Council
Received
23 Feb 2026
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/00675/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 4TE
Council
Received
23 Feb 2026
Validated
17 Mar 2026
Target date
12 May 2026
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
29 Apr 2026
Officer Report
29 Apr 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
17 Mar 2026
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (FRONT) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (SIDE) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : SECTION - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
17 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
29 Apr 2026
Officer Report
29 Apr 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
17 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ROOF PLAN - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (FRONT) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (REAR) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : ELEVATION (SIDE) - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
AMENDMENT : SECTION - PROPOSED
17 Mar 2026
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
17 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Jennie Rebairo — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Feb 2026
Application received
17 Mar 2026
Application validated
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo
23 Feb 2026
Application received
17 Mar 2026
Application validated
12 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Jennie Rebairo

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed extension, by virtue of size, design and roof arrangement represent an overly dominant, incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development that fails to relate to, or appear subservient to the original dwelling unbalancing the pair of semi-detached dwellings and would be disproportionate to the established character, form and pattern of development, detrimental to the visual amenities of the subject property and surrounding area. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D3 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30 and Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD8, DMD14 and DMD37 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 29 April 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing PL-16 Drawing PL-17a Drawing PL-01a Drawing PL-02a Drawing PL-03a Drawing PL-04a Drawing PL-05a Drawing PL-06a Drawing PL-07a Drawing PL-08a Drawing PL-09a Drawing PL-10a Drawing PL-11a Drawing PL-12a Drawing PL-13a Drawing PL-14a Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The proposed extension, by virtue of size, design and roof arrangement represent an overly dominant, incongruous, and visually intrusive form of development that fails to relate to, or appear subservient to the original dwelling unbalancing the pair of semi-detached dwellings and would be disproportionate to the established character, form and pattern of development, detrimental to the visual amenities of the subject property and surrounding area. The proposals are thereby contrary to Policies D3 of the London Plan (2021), Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30 and Development Management Document (2014) Policies DMD8, DMD14 and DMD37 and National Planning Policy Framework (2024). Dated: 29 April 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer jennie.rebairo@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing PL-16 Drawing PL-17a Drawing PL-01a Drawing PL-02a Drawing PL-03a Drawing PL-04a Drawing PL-05a Drawing PL-06a Drawing PL-07a Drawing PL-08a Drawing PL-09a Drawing PL-10a Drawing PL-11a Drawing PL-12a Drawing PL-13a Drawing PL-14a Drawing Additional Information APPEAL Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
D3CP30NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.