Planning application · Enfield
26/00724/HOU.
Householder at 2 Hadleigh Road London N9 7BX, received 24 Feb 2026 — refused on 20 May 2026 (delegated, Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 May 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension and construction of hard standing in connection with vehicular access.
Reference
26/00724/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 7BX
Ward
Council
Received
24 Feb 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
20 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/00724/HOU
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N9 7BX
Ward
Council
Received
24 Feb 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Target date
25 May 2026
Decision date
20 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 20 May 2026, delegated decision by Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
24 Feb 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
20 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
24 Feb 2026
Application received
30 Mar 2026
Application validated
25 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Mahboubeh Bahrami-Jovein
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
Insufficient Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal
would comply with the requirements set out in the NPPF (2024) and does not, therefore, provide a
suitable basis for assessment to be made of the flood risks arising from the proposed development. The
proposal would be contrary to the advice contained within the NPPF (2024), Policy CP28 of the Core
Strategy (2010) and DMD 60 and 62 of the Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposal has failed to demonstrate measures to promote and manage sustainable drainage
across the site which inhibits the ability of the Local Planning Authority to fully assess whether the
proposed development would result in an increase in flood risk on or off the site. The proposal is
therefore contrary to the NPPF (2024), London Plan (2021) SI12 and SI13, Enfield Core Strategy
Policies (2010) CP21 and CP28 and Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policies
DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61.
Dated: 20 May 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
PP-14551939v2 Drawing
P1 Drawing
P2 Drawing
FLOOD MAP FOR PLANNING Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
Insufficient Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposal
would comply with the requirements set out in the NPPF (2024) and does not, therefore, provide a
suitable basis for assessment to be made of the flood risks arising from the proposed development. The
proposal would be contrary to the advice contained within the NPPF (2024), Policy CP28 of the Core
Strategy (2010) and DMD 60 and 62 of the Development Management Document (2014).
2
The proposal has failed to demonstrate measures to promote and manage sustainable drainage
across the site which inhibits the ability of the Local Planning Authority to fully assess whether the
proposed development would result in an increase in flood risk on or off the site. The proposal is
therefore contrary to the NPPF (2024), London Plan (2021) SI12 and SI13, Enfield Core Strategy
Policies (2010) CP21 and CP28 and Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policies
DMD59, DMD60 and DMD61.
Dated: 20 May 2026
Authorised on behalf of:
Karen Page
Head of Planning and Building Control
Housing, Regeneration and Development Department
Enfield Council
PO Box 53, Civic Centre
Silver Street, Enfield
EN1 3XE
If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer mahboubeh.bahrami-
jovein@enfield.gov.uk.
List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice:
Title/Number Version TYPE
PP-14551939v2 Drawing
P1 Drawing
P2 Drawing
FLOOD MAP FOR PLANNING Supporting Information
Additional Information
APPEAL
Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse
permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP28DMD60Development Management Document 62NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.