Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldPonders End ward26/01007/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

26/01007/FUL.

95 Scotland Green Road Enfield EN3 4RB

Full / Other Planning at 95 Scotland Green Road Enfield EN3 4RB, received 13 Mar 2026 — refused on 2 Jun 2026 (delegated, Nicola Bickerstaff).

EnfieldPonders EndEN3 4RB26/01007/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Jun 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use from Use Class C3 (dwelling house) to Use Class C4 (HMO-house in multiple occupation). (RETROSPECTIVE).

Reference
26/01007/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 4RB
Council
Received
13 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
2 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Awaiting decision
Reference
26/01007/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN3 4RB
Council
Received
13 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Target date
4 Jun 2026
Decision date
2 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Awaiting decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
3 Jun 2026
Decision Notice
2 Jun 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
9 Apr 2026
existing & proposed floor plans
9 Apr 2026
bike storage
27 Mar 2026
highway impact pro forma
27 Mar 2026
The location plan
13 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
13 Mar 2026
Block plan of the site
13 Mar 2026
Officer Report
3 Jun 2026
Decision Notice
2 Jun 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
9 Apr 2026
Show all 9 rows
existing & proposed floor plans
9 Apr 2026
bike storage
27 Mar 2026
highway impact pro forma
27 Mar 2026
The location plan
13 Mar 2026
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY - COMPLETED FORM
13 Mar 2026
Block plan of the site
13 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 2 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Nicola Bickerstaff — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Mar 2026
Application received
9 Apr 2026
Application validated
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
2 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Nicola Bickerstaff
13 Mar 2026
Application received
9 Apr 2026
Application validated
4 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Nicola Bickerstaff

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The unauthorised development, by virtue of its inadequate floor areas, internal layouts, poor quality of outlook and insufficient natural light would result in substandard and inappropriate accommodation incapable of meeting the reasonable needs of occupiers, contrary Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies, D3, D4, D5 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD9 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and the London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016). Dated: 2 June 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer nicola.bickerstaff@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 001R0 Existing elevations and section Drawing 1.0 Bike Locker Drawing 003R2 Existing Floor Plans Drawing 001R2 Pre-existing floor plans Drawing PP-14775106v1 Location Plan Drawing TQRQM26071110407258 Existing Proposed Block Plan Drawing CIL form Supporting Information Highway Safety Impact Form Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The unauthorised development, by virtue of its inadequate floor areas, internal layouts, poor quality of outlook and insufficient natural light would result in substandard and inappropriate accommodation incapable of meeting the reasonable needs of occupiers, contrary Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies, D3, D4, D5 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), DMD6, DMD8, DMD9 and DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014) and the London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (2016). Dated: 2 June 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer nicola.bickerstaff@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE 001R0 Existing elevations and section Drawing 1.0 Bike Locker Drawing 003R2 Existing Floor Plans Drawing 001R2 Pre-existing floor plans Drawing PP-14775106v1 Location Plan Drawing TQRQM26071110407258 Existing Proposed Block Plan Drawing CIL form Supporting Information Highway Safety Impact Form Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12D3D4D5D6CP30DMD6DMD8DMD9DMD37NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.