Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasEnfieldPalmers Green ward26/01129/FUL
Planning application · Enfield

26/01129/FUL.

77 Conway Road London N14 7BD

Full / Other Planning at 77 Conway Road London N14 7BD, received 20 Mar 2026 — refused on 28 May 2026 (delegated, Kate Vaggers).

EnfieldPalmers GreenN14 7BD26/01129/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 May 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
2
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Widening of existing vehicular access with construction of hard standing.

Reference
26/01129/FUL
Type
Full
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7BD
Council
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Target date
2 Jun 2026
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/01129/FUL
Type
Full
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N14 7BD
Council
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Target date
2 Jun 2026
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
28 May 2026
PRESS NOTICE 15/04/2026
15 Apr 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
7 Apr 2026
PROPOSED SECTION & HARDSTANDING
7 Apr 2026
The location plan
20 Mar 2026
EXISTING & PROPOSED PLANS
20 Mar 2026
EXISTING & PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
20 Mar 2026
CIL FORM 1
20 Mar 2026
Heritage statement
20 Mar 2026
Decision Notice
28 May 2026
PRESS NOTICE 15/04/2026
15 Apr 2026
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
7 Apr 2026
Show all 9 rows
PROPOSED SECTION & HARDSTANDING
7 Apr 2026
The location plan
20 Mar 2026
EXISTING & PROPOSED PLANS
20 Mar 2026
EXISTING & PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN
20 Mar 2026
CIL FORM 1
20 Mar 2026
Heritage statement
20 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 28 May 2026, delegated decision by Kate Vaggers — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Mar 2026
Application received
7 Apr 2026
Application validated
2 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
28 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers
20 Mar 2026
Application received
7 Apr 2026
Application validated
2 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Kate Vaggers

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The removal of the front boundary wall and soft landscaping, and the increase in hardstanding to the front garden, would harm the character and appearance of the property, the street scene, and the Lakes Estate Conservation Area. The proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character of the Conservation Area and is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014), and the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal (2015). Dated: 28 May 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing 77_CR_DK_01 Drawing 77_CR_DK_02 Drawing 77_CR_DK_03 Drawing 77_CR_DK_02a B Drawing Heritage Statement Additional Information Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
1
The removal of the front boundary wall and soft landscaping, and the increase in hardstanding to the front garden, would harm the character and appearance of the property, the street scene, and the Lakes Estate Conservation Area. The proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character of the Conservation Area and is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policies DMD37 and DMD44 of the Development Management Document (2014), and the Lakes Estate Conservation Area Character Appraisal (2015). Dated: 28 May 2026 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer kate.vaggers@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE Location Plan Drawing 77_CR_DK_01 Drawing 77_CR_DK_02 Drawing 77_CR_DK_03 Drawing 77_CR_DK_02a B Drawing Heritage Statement Additional Information Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can
Policies cited
CP30CP31DMD37DMD44NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
Objections
2
In support
0
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.