Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›CAC/96/0020
Planning application · Enfield

CAC/96/0020.

Part Of Highlands Hospital Site, Worlds End Lane, Winchmore Hill, London, N21

Listed Building at Part Of Highlands Hospital Site, Worlds End Lane, Winchmore Hill, London, N21, received 13 Dec 1996 — refused on 15 Apr 1997 by committee.

Enfield›CAC/96/0020
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
15 Apr 1997
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of Building H1.

Reference
CAC/96/0020
Type
Conservation Area Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
13 Dec 1996
Target date
7 Feb 1997
Decision date
15 Apr 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
CAC/96/0020
Type
Conservation Area Consent
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
13 Dec 1996
Target date
7 Feb 1997
Decision date
15 Apr 1997
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 15 Apr 1997, determined by the planning committee — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Dec 1996
Application received
7 Feb 1997
Statutory target date
15 Apr 1997
Committee decision: Refused
13 Dec 1996
Application received
7 Feb 1997
Statutory target date
15 Apr 1997
Committee decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.