Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›TP/03/1657
Planning application · Enfield

TP/03/1657.

39, Parkgate Crescent, Barnet, EN4 0NW

Full / Other Planning at 39, Parkgate Crescent, Barnet, EN4 0NW, received 23 Sep 2003 — refused on 10 Oct 2003 (delegated, Richard Laws).

Enfield›EN4 0NW›TP/03/1657
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Oct 2003
2 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Conservatory at rear.

Reference
TP/03/1657
Type
Full
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN4 0NW
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
23 Sep 2003
Validated
20 Aug 2003
Target date
15 Oct 2003
Decision date
10 Oct 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
TP/03/1657
Type
Full
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EN4 0NW
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
23 Sep 2003
Validated
20 Aug 2003
Target date
15 Oct 2003
Decision date
10 Oct 2003
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 10 Oct 2003, delegated decision by Richard Laws — 2 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Sep 2003
Application received
20 Aug 2003
Application validated
15 Oct 2003
Statutory target date
10 Oct 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Laws
23 Sep 2003
Application received
20 Aug 2003
Application validated
15 Oct 2003
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
10 Oct 2003
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Laws

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.