Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Enfield›TP/05/1516
Planning application · Enfield

TP/05/1516.

Site, West Of Hoppers Road, Opposite Holly Lodge, 208 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London N21 3JR

Full / Other Planning at Site, West Of Hoppers Road, Opposite Holly Lodge, 208 Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, London N21 3JR, received 25 Aug 2005 — refused on 17 Oct 2005.

Enfield›N21 3JR›TP/05/1516
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Oct 2005
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of telecommunications telegraph pole to a maximum height of 10m (including antenna) and two equipment cabinets at base.

Reference
TP/05/1516
Type
Full
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N21 3JR
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
25 Aug 2005
Target date
19 Oct 2005
Decision date
17 Oct 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
TP/05/1516
Type
Full
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N21 3JR
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
25 Aug 2005
Target date
19 Oct 2005
Decision date
17 Oct 2005
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
25 Aug 2005
Appeal Decision
25 Aug 2005

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Oct 2005 — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Aug 2005
Application received
19 Oct 2005
Statutory target date
17 Oct 2005
Delegated decision: Refused
25 Aug 2005
Application received
19 Oct 2005
Statutory target date
17 Oct 2005
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.