Planning application · Enfield
TP/09/0271.
33, Firs Park Gardens, London, N21 2PX
Householder at 33, Firs Park Gardens, London, N21 2PX, received 27 Feb 2009 — approved on 26 Jun 2009.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Approved
Outcome
26 Jun 2009
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Single storey rear extension and rear dormer.
Reference
TP/09/0271
Type
Householder
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N21 2PX
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
27 Feb 2009
Validated
12 May 2009
Target date
7 Jul 2009
Decision date
26 Jun 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
TP/09/0271
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N21 2PX
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
27 Feb 2009
Validated
12 May 2009
Target date
7 Jul 2009
Decision date
26 Jun 2009
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 26 Jun 2009 — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Feb 2009
Application received
12 May 2009
Application validated
7 Jul 2009
Statutory target date
26 Jun 2009
Delegated decision: Approved
27 Feb 2009
Application received
12 May 2009
Application validated
7 Jul 2009
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Jun 2009
Delegated decision: Approved
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.