Planning Atlas
Planning application · Enfield

TP/99/0812.

Adjoining 8-10 Belmont Avenue, London, N9

Full / Other Planning at Adjoining 8-10 Belmont Avenue, London, N9, received 21 Jun 1999 — refused on 16 Aug 1999.

EnfieldTP/99/0812
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationEnfield profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Aug 1999
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Enfield planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Redevelopment of site by the erection of six 3-bed houses with associated landscaping and car parking.

Reference
TP/99/0812
Type
Full
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
21 Jun 1999
Target date
16 Aug 1999
Decision date
16 Aug 1999
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
TP/99/0812
Type
Full
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
21 Jun 1999
Target date
16 Aug 1999
Decision date
16 Aug 1999
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Enfield portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Aug 1999 — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Jun 1999
Application received
16 Aug 1999
Statutory target date
16 Aug 1999
Delegated decision: Refused
21 Jun 1999
Application received
16 Aug 1999
Statutory target date
16 Aug 1999
Delegated decision: Refused

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.