Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichAdjacent to 2 Foxhole Road Eltham SE901/0294/F
Planning application · Greenwich

01/0294/F.

Adjacent to 2 Foxhole Road Eltham SE9

Full / Other Planning at Adjacent to 2 Foxhole Road Eltham SE9, received 15 Feb 2001 — approved on 28 Mar 2001.

Greenwich01/0294/F
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Mar 2001
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a freestanding Royal Mail delivery pouch box.

Reference
01/0294/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
15 Feb 2001
Validated
30 Jan 2001
Target date
26 Mar 2001
Decision date
28 Mar 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
01/0294/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
15 Feb 2001
Validated
30 Jan 2001
Target date
26 Mar 2001
Decision date
28 Mar 2001
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Mar 2001 — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Feb 2001
Application received
30 Jan 2001
Application validated
26 Mar 2001
Statutory target date
28 Mar 2001
Delegated decision: Approved
15 Feb 2001
Application received
30 Jan 2001
Application validated
26 Mar 2001
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Mar 2001
Delegated decision: Approved

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.