Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Greenwich›…CHARLTON - NO LONGER EXISTS ward›20/1678/F
Planning application · Greenwich

20/1678/F.

29 BRAMSHOT AVENUE, CHARLTON, LONDON, SE7 7HY

Full / Other Planning at 29 BRAMSHOT AVENUE, CHARLTON, LONDON, SE7 7HY, received 10 Jun 2020 — refused on 17 Aug 2020 (delegated, Joe Higgins).

Greenwich›CHARLTON - NO LONGER EXISTS›SE7 7HY›20/1678/F
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Aug 2020
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a detached 1 bedroom dwelling with basement in rear garden. Re-submission.

Reference
20/1678/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE7 7HY
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jun 2020
Validated
22 Jun 2020
Target date
17 Aug 2020
Decision date
17 Aug 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Council register
Reference
20/1678/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE7 7HY
Ward
Council
Received
10 Jun 2020
Validated
22 Jun 2020
Target date
17 Aug 2020
Decision date
17 Aug 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Appeal decided
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal decision
16 Jul 2021
Officers delegated report
17 Aug 2020
Decision notice
17 Aug 2020
Unknown
23 Jun 2020
Basement impact assessment
22 Jun 2020
Unknown
22 Jun 2020
Application form redacted
11 Jun 2020
Design and access statement
11 Jun 2020
Internal daylight assessment
11 Jun 2020
Efp/19080 - 2 rev b
11 Jun 2020
Appeal decision
16 Jul 2021
Officers delegated report
17 Aug 2020
Decision notice
17 Aug 2020
Show all 10 rows
Unknown
23 Jun 2020
Basement impact assessment
22 Jun 2020
Unknown
22 Jun 2020
Application form redacted
11 Jun 2020
Design and access statement
11 Jun 2020
Internal daylight assessment
11 Jun 2020
Efp/19080 - 2 rev b
11 Jun 2020

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Aug 2020, delegated decision by Joe Higgins — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jun 2020
Application received
22 Jun 2020
Application validated
17 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Joe Higgins
10 Jun 2020
Application received
22 Jun 2020
Application validated
17 Aug 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Aug 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Joe Higgins

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development due to its siting in the existing communal rear garden serving the 2 flats occupying the first floor and roofspace of No. 29 Bramshot Avenue and the failure to compensate for the loss of external amenity space for these flats would result in an unreasonable loss of back garden amenity space currently enjoyed by occupiers of the upper floor flats within No. 29 Bramshot Avenue. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Policy 3.5 of the London Plan, the Mayor's Housing SPG and Policies H5 and H(c) of the adopted Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Housing SPG (2016).
2
The proposal by reason of the poor outlook afforded to the basement habitable accommodation as well as the location, substandard and low quality private external amenity space provided for the new dwellinghouse, the proposed development would provide an unacceptable standard of residential accommodation for future occupiers of the development, contrary to policy 3.5 of the London Plan (2016), the Mayor's Housing SPG (2016) and policy H5 of the adopted Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014).
1
The proposed development due to its siting in the existing communal rear garden serving the 2 flats occupying the first floor and roofspace of No. 29 Bramshot Avenue and the failure to compensate for the loss of external amenity space for these flats would result in an unreasonable loss of back garden amenity space currently enjoyed by occupiers of the upper floor flats within No. 29 Bramshot Avenue. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Policy 3.5 of the London Plan, the Mayor's Housing SPG and Policies H5 and H(c) of the adopted Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Housing SPG (2016).
2
The proposal by reason of the poor outlook afforded to the basement habitable accommodation as well as the location, substandard and low quality private external amenity space provided for the new dwellinghouse, the proposed development would provide an unacceptable standard of residential accommodation for future occupiers of the development, contrary to policy 3.5 of the London Plan (2016), the Mayor's Housing SPG (2016) and policy H5 of the adopted Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014).
Policies cited
London Plan 3.5H5H(c)

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.