Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichMOTTINGHAM, COLDHARBOUR & NEW ELTHAM ward25/0845/HD
Planning application · Greenwich

25/0845/HD.

140 DOMONIC DRIVE, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3LG

Householder at 140 DOMONIC DRIVE, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3LG, received 17 Mar 2025 — refused on 12 May 2025 (delegated, Courtney Muir).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 May 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
20
Documents
20 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a part first floor side and rear extension and associated loft conversion with hip to gable roof, roof alterations, rear box dormer, front rooflights and associated external works.

Reference
25/0845/HD
Type
Householders
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3LG
Council
Received
17 Mar 2025
Target date
12 May 2025
Decision date
12 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/0845/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3LG
Council
Received
17 Mar 2025
Target date
12 May 2025
Decision date
12 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision notice
12 May 2025
Officers delegated report
12 May 2025
Correspondance
14 Apr 2025
E.blk
17 Mar 2025
E.side
17 Mar 2025
E.rear
17 Mar 2025
E.1st.fp
17 Mar 2025
E.sec
17 Mar 2025
E.front
17 Mar 2025
P.1st.fp
17 Mar 2025
Decision notice
12 May 2025
Officers delegated report
12 May 2025
Correspondance
14 Apr 2025
Show all 10 rows
E.blk
17 Mar 2025
E.side
17 Mar 2025
E.rear
17 Mar 2025
E.1st.fp
17 Mar 2025
E.sec
17 Mar 2025
E.front
17 Mar 2025
P.1st.fp
17 Mar 2025

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 May 2025, delegated decision by Courtney Muir — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Mar 2025
Application received
12 May 2025
Statutory target date
12 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Courtney Muir
17 Mar 2025
Application received
12 May 2025
Statutory target date
12 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Courtney Muir

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed side and rear extension, rear dormer extension and roof alterations, considered cumulatively, would constitute dominant, overbearing and unsympathetic additions which would cause harm to the character of the host dwelling and the design context of the wider surrounding area, and would substantially unbalance the pair of dwellings with which the application site forms part. As such, the proposed development would be contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Councils Urban Design Guidance SPD (2023).
1
The proposed side and rear extension, rear dormer extension and roof alterations, considered cumulatively, would constitute dominant, overbearing and unsympathetic additions which would cause harm to the character of the host dwelling and the design context of the wider surrounding area, and would substantially unbalance the pair of dwellings with which the application site forms part. As such, the proposed development would be contrary to Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Councils Urban Design Guidance SPD (2023).
Policies cited
D3DH1DH(a)

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.