Planning application · Greenwich
25/3208/HD.
46 CORELLI ROAD, LONDON, SE3 8ER
Householder at 46 CORELLI ROAD, LONDON, SE3 8ER, received 29 Sep 2025 — refused on 17 Dec 2025 (delegated, Lucas Zoricak).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Dec 2025
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of existing garage to construct single storey side extension and associated works.
Reference
25/3208/HD
Type
Householders
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE3 8ER
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2025
Validated
27 Oct 2025
Target date
22 Dec 2025
Decision date
17 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
25/3208/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE3 8ER
Ward
Council
Received
29 Sep 2025
Validated
27 Oct 2025
Target date
22 Dec 2025
Decision date
17 Dec 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Dec 2025, delegated decision by Lucas Zoricak — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Sep 2025
Application received
27 Oct 2025
Application validated
22 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
17 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lucas Zoricak
29 Sep 2025
Application received
27 Oct 2025
Application validated
22 Dec 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Dec 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lucas Zoricak
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed side extension by reasons of its siting, scale and lack of setback from
the front elevation of the original dwelling would fail to achieve a subservient,
commensurate appearance in respect of the original dwelling. Furthermore, the
addition would unbalance the well-maintained scale, bulk and symmetry of the
terrace that the host property forms part of, failing to maintain the spatial character
and established development pattern of this area. As such, the proposed
development is contrary to Chapter 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework
(2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal
Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), and the Council's
Urban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2023).
1
The proposed side extension by reasons of its siting, scale and lack of setback from
the front elevation of the original dwelling would fail to achieve a subservient,
commensurate appearance in respect of the original dwelling. Furthermore, the
addition would unbalance the well-maintained scale, bulk and symmetry of the
terrace that the host property forms part of, failing to maintain the spatial character
and established development pattern of this area. As such, the proposed
development is contrary to Chapter 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework
(2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal
Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014), and the Council's
Urban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2023).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 16D3DH1DH(a)NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.