Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichWOOLWICH COMMON ward26/0174/F
Planning application · Greenwich

26/0174/F.

158 and 160 Burrage Road, Plumstead, London, SE18 7LA

Full / Other Planning at 158 and 160 Burrage Road, Plumstead, London, SE18 7LA, received 19 Jan 2026 — refused on 28 Apr 2026 (delegated, Brendan Meade).

GreenwichWOOLWICH COMMONSE18 7LA26/0174/F
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 Apr 2026
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
53
Documents
53 linked
1
Objections
1 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

External alterations and construction of first floor rear extension, construction of part 1, part 2 storey rear extension and second floor (roof) extension to the Lord Raglan PH; construction of part 1, part 2 storey extension to the rear of 160 Burrage Road; retention of public house use across part ground and basement levels alongside new 18 room aparthotel; reconfiguration of 160 Burrage Road to provide ancillary staff accommodation and manager?s flat; reinstatement of dropped kerb along Raglan Road; formation of new pub garden together with new hard and soft landscaping, bin and cycle stores.

Reference
26/0174/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE18 7LA
Council
Received
19 Jan 2026
Validated
3 Mar 2026
Target date
28 Apr 2026
Decision date
28 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0174/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE18 7LA
Council
Received
19 Jan 2026
Validated
3 Mar 2026
Target date
28 Apr 2026
Decision date
28 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officers delegated report
28 Apr 2026
Decision notice
28 Apr 2026
Tfl
2 Apr 2026
Planning statement
5 Mar 2026
Design and access statement
5 Mar 2026
Proposed ground floor demo
5 Mar 2026
Proposed ground floor plan
5 Mar 2026
Correspondance
5 Mar 2026
Existing roof plan
19 Feb 2026
Existing basement plan
19 Feb 2026
Officers delegated report
28 Apr 2026
Decision notice
28 Apr 2026
Tfl
2 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
Planning statement
5 Mar 2026
Design and access statement
5 Mar 2026
Proposed ground floor demo
5 Mar 2026
Proposed ground floor plan
5 Mar 2026
Correspondance
5 Mar 2026
Existing roof plan
19 Feb 2026
Existing basement plan
19 Feb 2026

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 28 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Brendan Meade — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Jan 2026
Application received
3 Mar 2026
Application validated
28 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
28 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Brendan Meade
19 Jan 2026
Application received
3 Mar 2026
Application validated
28 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Brendan Meade

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed double-storey rear extension to the rear of no.158 Burrage Road (Lord Raglan Public House), by virtue of their unsympathetic design, form and scale, would appear as a dominant and discordant feature on the host property that would fail to respect the character of the building or the wider locality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to the NPPF (2023), Policies D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1, H5 and H(c) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Royal Borough of Greenwich Urban Design Guide (2023).
2
By reason of its height, bulk and proximity to the shared southern and eastern boundary, two-storey rear extension to the rear of no.158 Burrage Road (Lord Raglan Public House), would lead to an excessive loss of outlook and increase in sense of enclosure for the occupiers of nos. 28 and 30 Ragland Road and 160 Burrage Road. Consequently, the proposal would cause considerable harm to the living conditions of the future occupiers of these dwellings and would fail to be in accordance with Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and policies DH(b) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014).
1
The proposed double-storey rear extension to the rear of no.158 Burrage Road (Lord Raglan Public House), by virtue of their unsympathetic design, form and scale, would appear as a dominant and discordant feature on the host property that would fail to respect the character of the building or the wider locality. The proposal would therefore be contrary to the NPPF (2023), Policies D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1, H5 and H(c) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Royal Borough of Greenwich Urban Design Guide (2023).
2
By reason of its height, bulk and proximity to the shared southern and eastern boundary, two-storey rear extension to the rear of no.158 Burrage Road (Lord Raglan Public House), would lead to an excessive loss of outlook and increase in sense of enclosure for the occupiers of nos. 28 and 30 Ragland Road and 160 Burrage Road. Consequently, the proposal would cause considerable harm to the living conditions of the future occupiers of these dwellings and would fail to be in accordance with Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and policies DH(b) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014).
Policies cited
D3DH1H5H(c)NPPFDH(b)

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
Objections
1
In support
1
Total comments
2
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.