Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichMOTTINGHAM, COLDHARBOUR & NEW ELTHAM ward26/0912/HD
Planning application · Greenwich

26/0912/HD.

94 MONTBELLE ROAD, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3NY

Householder at 94 MONTBELLE ROAD, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3NY, received 20 Mar 2026 — refused on 27 May 2026 (delegated, Sam Malis).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 May 2026
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
22
Documents
22 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construstion of a single story rear extension, a front extension, a hip to gable loft extension with 2 roof lights to front roof slope, amendment and repalcement of windows and associated works.

Reference
26/0912/HD
Type
Householders
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3NY
Council
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
2 Apr 2026
Target date
28 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0912/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3NY
Council
Received
20 Mar 2026
Validated
2 Apr 2026
Target date
28 May 2026
Decision date
27 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision notice
27 May 2026
Reports
27 May 2026
Existing & proposed west elevation
22 May 2026
Acknowledgement letter
8 Apr 2026
Fire safety strategy
7 Apr 2026
Existing & proposed north elevation
20 Mar 2026
Existinng & proposed first floor plan
20 Mar 2026
Existing & proposed ground floor plan
20 Mar 2026
Site location plan
20 Mar 2026
Existing & proposed south elevation
20 Mar 2026
Decision notice
27 May 2026
Reports
27 May 2026
Existing & proposed west elevation
22 May 2026
Show all 10 rows
Acknowledgement letter
8 Apr 2026
Fire safety strategy
7 Apr 2026
Existing & proposed north elevation
20 Mar 2026
Existinng & proposed first floor plan
20 Mar 2026
Existing & proposed ground floor plan
20 Mar 2026
Site location plan
20 Mar 2026
Existing & proposed south elevation
20 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 May 2026, delegated decision by Sam Malis — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Mar 2026
Application received
2 Apr 2026
Application validated
28 May 2026
Statutory target date
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Malis
20 Mar 2026
Application received
2 Apr 2026
Application validated
28 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Sam Malis

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed single storey rear extension, due to its excessive height, scale and bulk and the proposed alteration of the roof form of the original dwelling from a hipped to gable end, would constitute a dominant and overbearing additions to the host building to the detriment of its character and appearance, the character and appearance of the pair of semi-detached properties that it forms part of and the character and appearance of the wider area. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Urban Design Guide SPD (2023).
1
The proposed single storey rear extension, due to its excessive height, scale and bulk and the proposed alteration of the roof form of the original dwelling from a hipped to gable end, would constitute a dominant and overbearing additions to the host building to the detriment of its character and appearance, the character and appearance of the pair of semi-detached properties that it forms part of and the character and appearance of the wider area. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Urban Design Guide SPD (2023).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12D3DH1DH(a)NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.