Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichMOTTINGHAM, COLDHARBOUR & NEW ELTHAM wardSE9 3HZ26/0949/HD
Planning application · Greenwich

26/0949/HD.

95 CROUCH CROFT, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3HZ

Householder at 95 CROUCH CROFT, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3HZ, received 24 Mar 2026 — refused on 28 May 2026 (delegated, Amelia Elliott).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 May 2026
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a part single, part two storey rear extension and other associated works. [Amended Description]

Reference
26/0949/HD
Type
Householders
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
3 Apr 2026
Target date
29 May 2026
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/0949/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
24 Mar 2026
Validated
3 Apr 2026
Target date
29 May 2026
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officers delegated report
28 May 2026
Decision notice
28 May 2026
Photo 1 (rear)
8 Apr 2026
Photo 2 (rear)
8 Apr 2026
Photo 3 (side)
8 Apr 2026
Photo 4 (front)
8 Apr 2026
Fire safety statement
8 Apr 2026
Acknowledgement letter
8 Apr 2026
P1-00
25 Mar 2026
P1-101
25 Mar 2026
Officers delegated report
28 May 2026
Decision notice
28 May 2026
Photo 1 (rear)
8 Apr 2026
Show all 10 rows
Photo 2 (rear)
8 Apr 2026
Photo 3 (side)
8 Apr 2026
Photo 4 (front)
8 Apr 2026
Fire safety statement
8 Apr 2026
Acknowledgement letter
8 Apr 2026
P1-00
25 Mar 2026
P1-101
25 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 28 May 2026, delegated decision by Amelia Elliott — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
24 Mar 2026
Application received
3 Apr 2026
Application validated
29 May 2026
Statutory target date
28 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Amelia Elliott
24 Mar 2026
Application received
3 Apr 2026
Application validated
29 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Amelia Elliott

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, both in terms of its individual elements and when considered cumulatively, due to its height, scale and bulk and design would result in an uncharacteristic and unsympathetic addition to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property and the wider street scene. Consequently, the proposed development would constitute a dominant and overbearing addition which would not comply with the requirements of Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich local Plan Core Strategy (2014) and the Council’s Urban Design Guidance SPD (2023).
1
The proposed development, both in terms of its individual elements and when considered cumulatively, due to its height, scale and bulk and design would result in an uncharacteristic and unsympathetic addition to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property and the wider street scene. Consequently, the proposed development would constitute a dominant and overbearing addition which would not comply with the requirements of Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich local Plan Core Strategy (2014) and the Council’s Urban Design Guidance SPD (2023).
Policies cited
D3DH1DH(a)

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.