Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasGreenwichMOTTINGHAM, COLDHARBOUR & NEW ELTHAM ward26/1073/HD
Planning application · Greenwich

26/1073/HD.

17 DOMONIC DRIVE, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3LN

Householder at 17 DOMONIC DRIVE, ELTHAM, LONDON, SE9 3LN, received 6 Apr 2026 — refused on 1 Jun 2026 (delegated, Manisha Udatewar).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Jun 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing structure and construction of a double storey side extension.

Reference
26/1073/HD
Type
Householders
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3LN
Council
Received
6 Apr 2026
Target date
1 Jun 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
26/1073/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
SE9 3LN
Council
Received
6 Apr 2026
Target date
1 Jun 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision notice
1 Jun 2026
Reports
1 Jun 2026
Correspondance
13 Apr 2026
Existing & proposed drawing pack
7 Apr 2026
Photographs
7 Apr 2026
Application form redacted
7 Apr 2026
Decision notice
1 Jun 2026
Reports
1 Jun 2026
Correspondance
13 Apr 2026
Show all 6 rows
Existing & proposed drawing pack
7 Apr 2026
Photographs
7 Apr 2026
Application form redacted
7 Apr 2026

Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Manisha Udatewar — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Apr 2026
Application received
1 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Manisha Udatewar
6 Apr 2026
Application received
1 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Manisha Udatewar

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two-storey side extension, by reason of its positioning, scale, bulk, height and detailed design, would constitute an unsympathetic and dominant addition which would overwhelm the footprint of the existing dwelling, fail to appear subordinate to the host property and would unbalance the semi-detached properties with which the application site forms part. As such, the proposed development would cause harm to the character of the application site and the locality more widely and would be contrary to Policy D3 of London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (July 2014) and the Councils Urban Design Guidance SPD (October 2023).
1
The proposed two-storey side extension, by reason of its positioning, scale, bulk, height and detailed design, would constitute an unsympathetic and dominant addition which would overwhelm the footprint of the existing dwelling, fail to appear subordinate to the host property and would unbalance the semi-detached properties with which the application site forms part. As such, the proposed development would cause harm to the character of the application site and the locality more widely and would be contrary to Policy D3 of London Plan (2021), Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (July 2014) and the Councils Urban Design Guidance SPD (October 2023).
Policies cited
D3DH1DH(a)

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.