Planning application · Greenwich
26/1087/HD.
50 GUILDFORD GROVE, GREENWICH, LONDON, SE10 8JT
Householder at 50 GUILDFORD GROVE, GREENWICH, LONDON, SE10 8JT, received 6 Apr 2026 — refused on 1 Jun 2026 (delegated, Lucas Zoricak).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationGreenwich profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Jun 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Greenwich planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Installation of x1 air-source heat pump in rear garden and associated works
Reference
26/1087/HD
Type
Householders
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SE10 8JT
Ward
Council
Received
6 Apr 2026
Target date
1 Jun 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
26/1087/HD
Type
Householders
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SE10 8JT
Ward
Council
Received
6 Apr 2026
Target date
1 Jun 2026
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Greenwich portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 1 Jun 2026, delegated decision by Lucas Zoricak — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
6 Apr 2026
Application received
1 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lucas Zoricak
6 Apr 2026
Application received
1 Jun 2026
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Lucas Zoricak
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
By reason of the absence of information being submitted to the Local Planning Authority,
it cannot be ascertained that the development would not have an adverse impact on the
setting of the locally listed building and the wider character and appearance of the
Ashburnham Triangle Conservation Area. Consequently, the proposed development in
its current form is contrary to Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Chapters 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2024), Policies D3 and HC1 the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1, DH3,
DH(a), DH(h) and DH(j) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed
Policies (2014), Council's Urban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
(SPD) (2023), Ashburnham Triangle Conservation Area Appraisal (2008) and
Ashburnham Triangle Article 4 Direction Guidance (2016).
2
By reason of the absence of information being submitted to the Local Planning Authority,
it cannot be ascertained that the development would not have an adverse impact on
nearby trees Consequently, the proposed development in its current form is contrary to
Policy G7 of the London Plan, Policy SOS(f) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core
Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Urban Design Guide SPD (2023).
1
By reason of the absence of information being submitted to the Local Planning Authority,
it cannot be ascertained that the development would not have an adverse impact on the
setting of the locally listed building and the wider character and appearance of the
Ashburnham Triangle Conservation Area. Consequently, the proposed development in
its current form is contrary to Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Chapters 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2024), Policies D3 and HC1 the London Plan (2021), Policies DH1, DH3,
DH(a), DH(h) and DH(j) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed
Policies (2014), Council's Urban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
(SPD) (2023), Ashburnham Triangle Conservation Area Appraisal (2008) and
Ashburnham Triangle Article 4 Direction Guidance (2016).
2
By reason of the absence of information being submitted to the Local Planning Authority,
it cannot be ascertained that the development would not have an adverse impact on
nearby trees Consequently, the proposed development in its current form is contrary to
Policy G7 of the London Plan, Policy SOS(f) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core
Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Urban Design Guide SPD (2023).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12National Planning Policy Framework 16DH1DH3DH(a)DH(h)DH(j)NPPFG7SOS(f)
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.