Planning Atlas
AtlasHackneyDevelopers
Planning AtlasHackneyDevelopers
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgentsDevelopersViabilityAppeals
Hackney · Developers

Hackney developers.

The residential developers and housing associations bringing schemes forward in Hackney — who files the most, and whose applications get approved. Companies only; individual householders excluded.

34 developersCompanies only
Wards shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
What Hackney's developers file — by type
Click a slice to isolate it
54,251
All development · decisions
80%
approval rate
Approval over time · all development
50%75%100%’96’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
54,251decisions
At a glance · tap a metric for the investigation behind it
34
Developers on record
company applicants
960
Applications
all developers combined
13776
Units sought
all schemes combined
39%
Appeal overturn
London avg 26%
Developer league table — Hackney

Residential developers ranked by the applications they bring forward in the borough, 1990–26, with the approval rate they achieve. Pairing patterns, not endorsements.

125 of 34

Applications and approval rates from Hackney's published decision notices. Units sought are counted from proposal text where a residential figure is stated, so they understate the true total. Approval rates are only shown when a developer has 5+ applications. Methodology →

Who hires whom — developer & consultant pairings in Hackney
PROSubscriber intelligence

60 verified developer–consultant pairings in Hackney — who actually works with whom, how many applications they have filed together, and how those pairings fare. Counted from the borough's own decided record.

See Atlas Pro →
Consented but unbuilt — Hackney
97Stalled permissions
5Median years since consent

Permissions in Hackney with no later planning-record evidence of discharge, commencement or a superseding consent. The full investigation →