Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hammersmith And Fulham›…Ravenscourt wardW6 0TU54 Ravenscourt Gardens London W6 0TU›2001/00620/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2001/00620/FUL.

54 Ravenscourt Gardens London W6 0TU

Full / Other Planning at 54 Ravenscourt Gardens London W6 0TU, received 12 Mar 2001 — approved on 13 Jul 2001 (delegated, Jeremy Howell).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Jul 2001
18 wks
Decision time
10 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of single storey rear extension and privacy screen and door to side of property.

Reference
2001/00620/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
12 Mar 2001
Target date
13 Jul 2004
Decision date
13 Jul 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2001/00620/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
12 Mar 2001
Target date
13 Jul 2004
Decision date
13 Jul 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
—
Decision
—
Decision
—
Decision
—

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Jul 2001, delegated decision by Jeremy Howell — 18 weeks from submission (10 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Mar 2001
Application received
13 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
13 Jul 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jeremy Howell
12 Mar 2001
Application received
13 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
13 Jul 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jeremy Howell

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.