Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamRavenscourt ward2001/00679/LBC
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2001/00679/LBC.

54 Ravenscourt Gardens London W6 0TU

Listed Building at 54 Ravenscourt Gardens London W6 0TU, received 15 Mar 2001 — approved on 13 Jul 2001 (delegated, Jeremy Howell).

Hammersmith And FulhamRavenscourtW6 0TU2001/00679/LBC
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Jul 2001
17 wks
Decision time
9 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing single storey extension; erection of a single storey rear extension; erection of a privacy screen and new door to side of house; internal alterations at rear ground level and new first floor window to rear.

Reference
2001/00679/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent
Case officer
Postcode
W6 0TU
Received
15 Mar 2001
Target date
13 Jul 2004
Decision date
13 Jul 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2001/00679/LBC
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
W6 0TU
Received
15 Mar 2001
Target date
13 Jul 2004
Decision date
13 Jul 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Jul 2001, delegated decision by Jeremy Howell — 17 weeks from submission (9 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Mar 2001
Application received
13 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
13 Jul 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jeremy Howell
15 Mar 2001
Application received
13 Jul 2004
Statutory target date
13 Jul 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Jeremy Howell

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.