Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamNorth End ward2001/01858/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2001/01858/FUL.

Earls Court 2 Lillie Road London

Full / Other Planning at Earls Court 2 Lillie Road London, received 12 Jul 2001 — approved on 24 Aug 2001 (delegated, Laurence O'Keeffe).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 Aug 2001
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of 2.4 metre high PVC mesh fencing along the North-West boundary of the site to match the existing fencing.

Reference
2001/01858/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Case officer
Received
12 Jul 2001
Target date
24 Aug 2004
Decision date
24 Aug 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2001/01858/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 14 rows
Case officer
Received
12 Jul 2001
Target date
24 Aug 2004
Decision date
24 Aug 2001
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 24 Aug 2001, delegated decision by Laurence O'Keeffe — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
12 Jul 2001
Application received
24 Aug 2004
Statutory target date
24 Aug 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Laurence O'Keeffe
12 Jul 2001
Application received
24 Aug 2004
Statutory target date
24 Aug 2001
Delegated decision: Approved · Laurence O'Keeffe

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.