Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamAvonmore ward2002/02395/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2002/02395/FUL.

28 Far Road London W14 0EP

Full / Other Planning at 28 Far Road London W14 0EP, received 25 Sep 2002 — approved on 13 Nov 2002 (delegated, Michael Hughes).

Hammersmith And FulhamAvonmoreW14 0EP2002/02395/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
13 Nov 2002
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a rear roof extension.

Reference
2002/02395/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W14 0EP
Received
25 Sep 2002
Target date
13 Nov 2005
Decision date
13 Nov 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2002/02395/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W14 0EP
Received
25 Sep 2002
Target date
13 Nov 2005
Decision date
13 Nov 2002
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 13 Nov 2002, delegated decision by Michael Hughes — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Sep 2002
Application received
13 Nov 2005
Statutory target date
13 Nov 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Michael Hughes
25 Sep 2002
Application received
13 Nov 2005
Statutory target date
13 Nov 2002
Delegated decision: Approved · Michael Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.