Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamMunster wardSW6 5LP45 Ringmer Avenue London SW6 5LP2002/02671/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2002/02671/FUL.

45 Ringmer Avenue London SW6 5LP

Full / Other Planning at 45 Ringmer Avenue London SW6 5LP, received 30 Oct 2002 — approved on 6 Jan 2003 (delegated, Celeste Giusti).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
6 Jan 2003
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a rear roof extension; installation of three rooflights in the front roofslope.

Reference
2002/02671/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
30 Oct 2002
Validated
11 Nov 2002
Target date
6 Jan 2006
Decision date
6 Jan 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2002/02671/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
Received
30 Oct 2002
Validated
11 Nov 2002
Target date
6 Jan 2006
Decision date
6 Jan 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision
Decision
Decision
Decision

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 6 Jan 2003, delegated decision by Celeste Giusti — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
30 Oct 2002
Application received
11 Nov 2002
Application validated
6 Jan 2006
Statutory target date
6 Jan 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Celeste Giusti
30 Oct 2002
Application received
11 Nov 2002
Application validated
6 Jan 2006
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Jan 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Celeste Giusti

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.