Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham
2003/00949/FUL.
Full / Other Planning at 9 Far Road London W14 0EL, received 27 Mar 2003 — approved on 28 Jul 2004 (delegated, Michael Hughes).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jul 2004
70 wks
Decision time
62 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Retention of a part one, part two storey rear extension; erection of a rear roof extension.
Reference
2003/00949/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W14 0EL
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2003
Validated
4 Mar 2004
Target date
28 Jul 2007
Decision date
28 Jul 2004
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2003/00949/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
W14 0EL
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2003
Validated
4 Mar 2004
Target date
28 Jul 2007
Decision date
28 Jul 2004
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 28 Jul 2004, delegated decision by Michael Hughes — 70 weeks from submission (62 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Mar 2003
Application received
4 Mar 2004
Application validated
28 Jul 2007
Statutory target date
28 Jul 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Michael Hughes
27 Mar 2003
Application received
4 Mar 2004
Application validated
28 Jul 2007
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
28 Jul 2004
Delegated decision: Approved · Michael Hughes
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.