Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham
2014/06125/FUL.
Flat Second Floor 95 Edith Road London W14 0TJ
Full / Other Planning at Flat Second Floor 95 Edith Road London W14 0TJ — approved on 23 Feb 2015.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Feb 2015
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
23
Documents
23 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a rear roof extension; installation of 1no rooflight in the front roofslope.
Reference
2014/06125/FUL
Type
Full Detailed Planning Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W14 0TJ
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
29 Dec 2014
Target date
23 Feb 2015
Decision date
23 Feb 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Approved
Council register
Reference
2014/06125/FUL
Type
Full Detailed Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
W14 0TJ
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
29 Dec 2014
Target date
23 Feb 2015
Decision date
23 Feb 2015
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Application Approved
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 23 Feb 2015.
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Dec 2014
Application validated
23 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
23 Feb 2015
Delegated decision: Approved
29 Dec 2014
Application validated
23 Feb 2015
Statutory target date
23 Feb 2015
Delegated decision: Approved
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.