Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamSands End ward2022/01637/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2022/01637/FUL.

Flat A 35 Rosebury Road London SW6 2NQ

Full / Other Planning at Flat A 35 Rosebury Road London SW6 2NQ, received 8 Jun 2022 — refused on 24 Apr 2024 (delegated, Amy Wilkie).

Hammersmith And FulhamSands EndSW6 2NQ2022/01637/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Apr 2024
98 wks
Decision time
90 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
20
Documents
20 linked
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Allowed in Part - Split Decision
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of existing single glazed timber sash windows to the front elevation with new double glazed uPVC sash windows in a white woodgrain finish; replacement of single glazed timber sash and casement windows to the rear elevation with new double glazed uPVC sash and casement windows; replacement of single glazed timber door to the rear elevation with new double glazed uPVC door to Flat 35A (located over first and second floor level).

Reference
2022/01637/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SW6 2NQ
Received
8 Jun 2022
Validated
23 Jun 2022
Target date
24 Apr 2027
Decision date
24 Apr 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Appeal Decided
Reference
2022/01637/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SW6 2NQ
Received
8 Jun 2022
Validated
23 Jun 2022
Target date
24 Apr 2027
Decision date
24 Apr 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Appeal Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
LOCATION-PLAN
EXISTING-AND-PROPOSED-PLANS
TECH-DRAWING---ULTIMATE-ROSE
DESIGN-AND-ACCESS-STATEMENT-35-ROSEBURY-ROAD
TECH-DRAWING---HERITAGE-ROSE
EMAIL
EXISTING-AND-PROPOSED-ELEVATIONS
OFFICER-S-FILE-NOTE
FRONT-ELEVATION--ULTIMATE-ROSE.-REAR-ELEVATION-HERITAGE-ROSE
REFUSAL-OF-FULL-PLANNING-PERMISSION
LOCATION-PLAN
EXISTING-AND-PROPOSED-PLANS
TECH-DRAWING---ULTIMATE-ROSE
Show all 10 rows
DESIGN-AND-ACCESS-STATEMENT-35-ROSEBURY-ROAD
TECH-DRAWING---HERITAGE-ROSE
EMAIL
EXISTING-AND-PROPOSED-ELEVATIONS
OFFICER-S-FILE-NOTE
FRONT-ELEVATION--ULTIMATE-ROSE.-REAR-ELEVATION-HERITAGE-ROSE
REFUSAL-OF-FULL-PLANNING-PERMISSION

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Apr 2024, delegated decision by Amy Wilkie — 98 weeks from submission (90 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
8 Jun 2022
Application received
23 Jun 2022
Application validated
24 Apr 2027
Statutory target date
24 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Amy Wilkie
Appeal
Appeal lodged · Appeal Allowed in Part - Split Decision
8 Jun 2022
Application received
23 Jun 2022
Application validated
24 Apr 2027
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
24 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Amy Wilkie
Appeal
Appeal lodged · Appeal Allowed in Part - Split Decision

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal lodged
Outcome: Appeal Allowed in Part - Split Decision
Appeal lodged
Outcome: Appeal Allowed in Part - Split Decision

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.