Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHammersmith And FulhamConingham ward2023/00593/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2023/00593/FUL.

Flat Basement And Ground Floor 56 Coningham Road London W12 8BH

Full / Other Planning at Flat Basement And Ground Floor 56 Coningham Road London W12 8BH, received 7 Mar 2023 — refused on 3 May 2023 (delegated, George Shakir).

Hammersmith And FulhamConinghamW12 8BH2023/00593/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 May 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
31
Documents
31 linked
0
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Appeal Dismissed
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a rear extension at upper ground floor level, over part of the back addition; erection of a single storey rear extension, to the side of the existing back addition at lower ground floor level; installation of bi-folding doors to replace existing door, to the rear elevation at lower ground floor level; external alterations to the proposed rear garden, including the formation of a patio area and the erection of external steps.

Reference
2023/00593/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W12 8BH
Received
7 Mar 2023
Validated
8 Mar 2023
Target date
3 May 2026
Decision date
3 May 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Appeal Decided
Reference
2023/00593/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Case officer
Postcode
W12 8BH
Received
7 Mar 2023
Validated
8 Mar 2023
Target date
3 May 2026
Decision date
3 May 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Appeal Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
FLOOD-RISK-ASSESSMENT-56-CONINGHAM-ROAD-W12-8BH-(08072021)
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-02-REVA-A3DWG-1-100
DESIGN-AND-ACCESS-STATEMENT-13022023
CONINGHAMRD56-TP-210520-P-01-REVF-A3DWG-1-100
CIL_QUESTIONS-CONINGHAM-ROAD-56-REAR-EXTENSIONS-(27022023)
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-01-REVB-A3DWG-1-100
CONINGHAMRD56-TP-210520-LP-01-REVD-A3DWG-1-200-1-1250
PLANNING-HISTORY-CONINGHAM-ROAD-W12-(UPDATED-FEBRUARY-2023)
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-02-REVA-A3DWG-1-100
FLOOD-RISK-ASSESSMENT-56-CONINGHAM-ROAD-W12-8BH-(08072021)
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-02-REVA-A3DWG-1-100
DESIGN-AND-ACCESS-STATEMENT-13022023
Show all 10 rows
CONINGHAMRD56-TP-210520-P-01-REVF-A3DWG-1-100
CIL_QUESTIONS-CONINGHAM-ROAD-56-REAR-EXTENSIONS-(27022023)
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-01-REVB-A3DWG-1-100
CONINGHAMRD56-TP-210520-LP-01-REVD-A3DWG-1-200-1-1250
PLANNING-HISTORY-CONINGHAM-ROAD-W12-(UPDATED-FEBRUARY-2023)
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
CONINGHAMRD56-SU-210520-E-02-REVA-A3DWG-1-100

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 May 2023, delegated decision by George Shakir — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Mar 2023
Application received
8 Mar 2023
Application validated
3 May 2026
Statutory target date
3 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · George Shakir
Appeal
Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed
7 Mar 2023
Application received
8 Mar 2023
Application validated
3 May 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
3 May 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · George Shakir
Appeal
Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal lodged
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Appeal lodged
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.