Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hammersmith And Fulham›…Sands End ward›2025/01401/FUL
Planning application · Hammersmith And Fulham

2025/01401/FUL.

62 Chelsea Crescent Harbour Avenue Chelsea Harbour London SW10 0XB

Full / Other Planning at 62 Chelsea Crescent Harbour Avenue Chelsea Harbour London SW10 0XB, received 20 May 2025 — withdrawn.

Hammersmith And Fulham›Sands End›SW10 0XB›2025/01401/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHammersmith And Fulham profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
29 Apr 2026
49 wks
Decision time
41 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hammersmith And Fulham planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of an external air conditioning unit on top of the flat roof (balcony), to the rear elevation at third floor level.

Reference
2025/01401/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SW10 0XB
Ward
Council
Received
20 May 2025
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Reference
2025/01401/FUL
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
SW10 0XB
Ward
Council
Received
20 May 2025
Decision date
29 Apr 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Withdrawn
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
LIRA-BALCONY
—
LIRA-BALCONY-2
—
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
—
LOCATIONPLAN
—
LIRA-BALCONY
—
LIRA-BALCONY-2
—
APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED
—
Show all 4 rows
LOCATIONPLAN
—

Documents open on the Hammersmith And Fulham portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Status: Withdrawn. No decision is recorded yet.

Timeline

Date
Event
20 May 2025
Application received
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: — · Hasna Miah
20 May 2025
Application received
29 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: — · Hasna Miah

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.