Planning application · Haringey
HGY/2021/1771.
Other at The Goods Yard and The Depot 36 & 44-52 White Hart Lane (and land to the rear) and 867-879 High Road (and land to the rear) London N17 8EY — refused on 21 Dec 2021.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHaringey profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Dec 2021
—
Decision time
submission → decision
—
Conditions
not captured
599
Documents
200 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Haringey planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Full planning application for (i) the demolition of existing buildings and structures, site clearance and the redevelopment of the site for a residential-led, mixed-use development comprising residential units (C3); flexible commercial, business, community, retail and service uses (Class E); hard and soft landscaping; associated parking; and associated works. (ii) Change of use of No. 52 White Hart Lane from residential (C3) to a flexible retail (Class E) (iii) Change of use of No. 867-869 High Road to residential (C3) use. This proposal is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.
Reference
HGY/2021/1771
Type
Other
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N17 8EY
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
21 Jun 2021
Decision date
21 Dec 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Made
Reference
HGY/2021/1771
Type
Other
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Not recorded
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
N17 8EY
Ward
Council
Received
—
Validated
21 Jun 2021
Decision date
21 Dec 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Made
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
599 documents on the council file; the first 200 are listed here.
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 Dec 2021.
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Jun 2021
Application validated
21 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
21 Jun 2021
Application validated
21 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
REASONS FOR REFUSAL FOR DECISION REFERENCE No. HGY/2021/1771
The application shown above has been refused for the following reasons:
Tall Buildings
The proposed tall buildings (Goods Yard Blocks A and B and Depot Block A), by virtue of their height,
breadth, proximity to each other and to the existing River Apartments tall building, and by virtue of their
architectural expression and design, would: (i) have an unacceptable adverse effect on long, mid-range and
immediate views from the surrounding area, including the wider setting of designated and undesignated
heritage assets; (ii) maximise rather than optimise residential density; and (iii) fail to be of a sufficiently high
architectural quality expected of such prominent buildings. As such, the proposed development would be
contrary to the Paragraphs 130 and 134 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policies GG2, D3, D9 and
HC1, Local Plan Strategic Policies SP1, SP11 and SP12, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and
Site Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies DM6 and DM9 and guidance in the adopted High Road West
Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
Heritage
The proposed tall buildings (Goods Yard Blocks A and B and Depot Block A), by virtue of their, height,
breadth and architectural expression, would cause less than substantial harm to the significance and
setting of designated and undesignated heritage assets in the surrounding area that is not outweighed by
the likely public benefits that would be delivered. As such, there would be a clear reason to refuse the
proposals pursuant to Paragraph 11(d)(i) of the NPPF (July 2021) and the proposed development would be
contrary to the Paragraph 202 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policy, Local Plan Strategic Policies
SP11 and SP12, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and Site Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies
DM6 and DM9 and guidance in the adopted High Road West Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
OPEN SPACE
The proposed development includes an insufficient provision of publicly accessible open space for the
estimated resident population and as such fails to optimise site capacity through the design-led approach.
This under provision is contrary to Paragraphs 7, 93 and 98 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policies
GG2 and D3, Local Plan Strategic Policy SP13, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and Site
Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies DM12 and DM20 and guidance in the adopted High Road West
Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
6th Floor, River Park House,
225 High Road, Wood Green,
1
REASONS FOR REFUSAL FOR DECISION REFERENCE No. HGY/2021/1771
The application shown above has been refused for the following reasons:
Tall Buildings
The proposed tall buildings (Goods Yard Blocks A and B and Depot Block A), by virtue of their height,
breadth, proximity to each other and to the existing River Apartments tall building, and by virtue of their
architectural expression and design, would: (i) have an unacceptable adverse effect on long, mid-range and
immediate views from the surrounding area, including the wider setting of designated and undesignated
heritage assets; (ii) maximise rather than optimise residential density; and (iii) fail to be of a sufficiently high
architectural quality expected of such prominent buildings. As such, the proposed development would be
contrary to the Paragraphs 130 and 134 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policies GG2, D3, D9 and
HC1, Local Plan Strategic Policies SP1, SP11 and SP12, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and
Site Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies DM6 and DM9 and guidance in the adopted High Road West
Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
Heritage
The proposed tall buildings (Goods Yard Blocks A and B and Depot Block A), by virtue of their, height,
breadth and architectural expression, would cause less than substantial harm to the significance and
setting of designated and undesignated heritage assets in the surrounding area that is not outweighed by
the likely public benefits that would be delivered. As such, there would be a clear reason to refuse the
proposals pursuant to Paragraph 11(d)(i) of the NPPF (July 2021) and the proposed development would be
contrary to the Paragraph 202 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policy, Local Plan Strategic Policies
SP11 and SP12, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and Site Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies
DM6 and DM9 and guidance in the adopted High Road West Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
OPEN SPACE
The proposed development includes an insufficient provision of publicly accessible open space for the
estimated resident population and as such fails to optimise site capacity through the design-led approach.
This under provision is contrary to Paragraphs 7, 93 and 98 of the NPPF (July 2021), London Plan Policies
GG2 and D3, Local Plan Strategic Policy SP13, North Tottenham AAP Policies AAP5, AAP6 and Site
Allocation NT5, Local Plan Policies DM12 and DM20 and guidance in the adopted High Road West
Masterplan Framework (September 2014).
6th Floor, River Park House,
225 High Road, Wood Green,
Policies cited
GG2D3D9HC1DM6DM9DM12DM20NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant not recorded
The council record carries no applicant name.
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.