Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Upminster ward42 St Albans Avenue Cranham›D0190.14
Planning application · Havering

D0190.14.

42 St Albans Avenue Cranham

Lawful Development Certificate at 42 St Albans Avenue Cranham, received 28 Aug 2014 — not required on 16 Oct 2014 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

Havering›Upminster›D0190.14
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Not required
Outcome
16 Oct 2014
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of Lawfulness for loft conversion with hip to gable build up and rear dormer

Reference
D0190.14
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
28 Aug 2014
Target date
23 Oct 2014
Decision date
16 Oct 2014
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
D0190.14
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
28 Aug 2014
Target date
23 Oct 2014
Decision date
16 Oct 2014
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 16 Oct 2014, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Aug 2014
Application received
23 Oct 2014
Statutory target date
16 Oct 2014
Delegated decision: Not required · Aidan Hughes
28 Aug 2014
Application received
23 Oct 2014
Statutory target date
16 Oct 2014
Delegated decision: Not required · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.