Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringGooshays wardRM3 9YL19 Dagnam Park Close Romford RM3 9YLD0304.23
Planning application · Havering

D0304.23.

19 Dagnam Park Close Romford RM3 9YL

Lawful Development Certificate at 19 Dagnam Park Close Romford RM3 9YL, received 26 Jun 2023 — not required on 21 Aug 2023 (delegated, Louise Jarrett).

HaveringGooshaysRM3 9YLD0304.23
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Not required
Outcome
21 Aug 2023
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Creation of an Outbuilding at the bottom of the garden.

Reference
D0304.23
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
26 Jun 2023
Target date
21 Aug 2023
Decision date
21 Aug 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Reference
D0304.23
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
26 Jun 2023
Target date
21 Aug 2023
Decision date
21 Aug 2023
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Show all 6 rows
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 21 Aug 2023, delegated decision by Louise Jarrett — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
26 Jun 2023
Application received
21 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
21 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Not required · Louise Jarrett
26 Jun 2023
Application received
21 Aug 2023
Statutory target date
21 Aug 2023
Delegated decision: Not required · Louise Jarrett

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.