Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Squirrels Heath wardRM2 6QD11 BELGRAVE AVENUE ROMFORD RM2 6QD›D0504.17
Planning application · Havering

D0504.17.

11 BELGRAVE AVENUE ROMFORD RM2 6QD

Lawful Development Certificate at 11 BELGRAVE AVENUE ROMFORD RM2 6QD, received 13 Dec 2017 — not required on 7 Feb 2018 (delegated, Steven Hoang).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Not required
Outcome
7 Feb 2018
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of Lawfulness for a hip to gable loft conversion with rear dormer to include Juliette balcony and roof lights to front elevation.

Reference
D0504.17
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
13 Dec 2017
Target date
7 Feb 2018
Decision date
7 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
D0504.17
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
13 Dec 2017
Target date
7 Feb 2018
Decision date
7 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 7 Feb 2018, delegated decision by Steven Hoang — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Dec 2017
Application received
7 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
7 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Not required · Steven Hoang
13 Dec 2017
Application received
7 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
7 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Not required · Steven Hoang

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.