Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Romford Town wardRM11 1AA2 Dymoke Road HORNCHURCH RM11 1AA›D0514.17
Planning application · Havering

D0514.17.

2 Dymoke Road HORNCHURCH RM11 1AA

Lawful Development Certificate at 2 Dymoke Road HORNCHURCH RM11 1AA, received 22 Dec 2017 — not required on 27 Feb 2018 (delegated, Bob Roper).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Not required
Outcome
27 Feb 2018
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of Lawfulness for a loft conversion with rear dormer to include roof alterations and roof lights in front elevation.

Reference
D0514.17
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
22 Dec 2017
Target date
16 Feb 2018
Decision date
27 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
D0514.17
Type
Lawful Development Certificate
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
22 Dec 2017
Target date
16 Feb 2018
Decision date
27 Feb 2018
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
PP not required Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 27 Feb 2018, delegated decision by Bob Roper — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Dec 2017
Application received
16 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
27 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Not required · Bob Roper
22 Dec 2017
Application received
16 Feb 2018
Statutory target date
27 Feb 2018
Delegated decision: Not required · Bob Roper

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.