Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Mawneys wardRM5 3PR4a Chase Cross Road pavement outside Romford RM5 3PR›M0016.18
Planning application · Havering

M0016.18.

4a Chase Cross Road pavement outside Romford RM5 3PR

Prior Approval at 4a Chase Cross Road pavement outside Romford RM5 3PR, received 21 Nov 2018 — refused on 11 Jan 2019 (delegated, Cole Hodder).

Havering›Mawneys›RM5 3PR›M0016.18
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jan 2019
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Removal of 2 No existing BT Call Boxes and replacement with 1 no. new InLink.(PRIOR APPROVAL)

Reference
M0016.18
Type
Prior Approval
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Nov 2018
Target date
15 Jan 2019
Decision date
11 Jan 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pr App Refused Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
M0016.18
Type
Prior Approval
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
21 Nov 2018
Target date
15 Jan 2019
Decision date
11 Jan 2019
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Pr App Refused Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 11 Jan 2019, delegated decision by Cole Hodder — 7 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Nov 2018
Application received
15 Jan 2019
Statutory target date
11 Jan 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Cole Hodder
21 Nov 2018
Application received
15 Jan 2019
Statutory target date
11 Jan 2019
Delegated decision: Refused · Cole Hodder

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.