Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringSt Andrew's wardP0065.19
Planning application · Havering

P0065.19.

1 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS

Full / Other Planning at 1 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS, received 15 Jan 2019 — refused on 26 Feb 2020 (delegated, Scott Schimanski).

HaveringSt Andrew'sRM11 1TSP0065.19
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Feb 2020
58 wks
Decision time
50 wks over the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of the existing garages and construction of three dwellings houses including new public realm, landscape amenity space, car parking and all associated works.

Reference
P0065.19
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 1TS
Council
Received
15 Jan 2019
Validated
6 Feb 2019
Target date
12 Apr 2019
Decision date
26 Feb 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
NDAL e refuse (Appealed)
Reference
P0065.19
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM11 1TS
Council
Received
15 Jan 2019
Validated
6 Feb 2019
Target date
12 Apr 2019
Decision date
26 Feb 2020
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
NDAL e refuse (Appealed)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Feb 2020, delegated decision by Scott Schimanski — 58 weeks from submission (50 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Jan 2019
Application received
6 Feb 2019
Application validated
12 Apr 2019
Statutory target date
26 Feb 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Scott Schimanski
15 Jan 2019
Application received
6 Feb 2019
Application validated
12 Apr 2019
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
26 Feb 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Scott Schimanski

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.