Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHacton wardP0102.26
Planning application · Havering

P0102.26.

9 Kent Drive Hornchurch RM12 6TD

Full / Other Planning at 9 Kent Drive Hornchurch RM12 6TD, received 28 Jan 2026 — approved on 27 Mar 2026 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringHactonRM12 6TDP0102.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
27 Mar 2026
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Storey rear extension following demolition of existing garage

Reference
P0102.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 6TD
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jan 2026
Validated
30 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
27 Mar 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0102.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM12 6TD
Ward
Council
Received
28 Jan 2026
Validated
30 Jan 2026
Target date
27 Mar 2026
Decision date
27 Mar 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 27 Mar 2026, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Jan 2026
Application received
30 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
27 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes
28 Jan 2026
Application received
30 Jan 2026
Application validated
27 Mar 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Mar 2026
Delegated decision: Approved · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.