Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHarold Wood wardP0104.26
Planning application · Havering

P0104.26.

24 Hamilton Drive Romford RM3 0UU

Full / Other Planning at 24 Hamilton Drive Romford RM3 0UU, received 28 Jan 2026 — refused on 20 Apr 2026 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringHarold WoodRM3 0UUP0104.26
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Apr 2026
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Loft extension & first floor extension, hip to gable end roof extensions, installation of rear dormer and roof lights to front

Reference
P0104.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 0UU
Council
Received
28 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
20 Apr 2026
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0104.26
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 0UU
Council
Received
28 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Feb 2026
Target date
20 Apr 2026
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
20 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
20 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
28 Jan 2026
Application received
2 Feb 2026
Application validated
20 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.