Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringElm Park wardP0116.25
Planning application · Havering

P0116.25.

75 Tuck Road Rainham RM13 7HJ

Full / Other Planning at 75 Tuck Road Rainham RM13 7HJ, received 28 Jan 2025 — refused on 25 Mar 2025 (delegated, Kelvin Naicker).

HaveringElm ParkRM13 7HJP0116.25
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Mar 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed two storey rear and side extension

Reference
P0116.25
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 7HJ
Council
Received
28 Jan 2025
Target date
25 Mar 2025
Decision date
25 Mar 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0116.25
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM13 7HJ
Council
Received
28 Jan 2025
Target date
25 Mar 2025
Decision date
25 Mar 2025
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Application Form
Supporting Document
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Show all 5 rows
Application Form
Supporting Document

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Kelvin Naicker — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
28 Jan 2025
Application received
25 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
25 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker
28 Jan 2025
Application received
25 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
25 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelvin Naicker

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.