Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Hilldene ward161 Chippenham Road Harold Hill Romford›P0125.99
Planning application · Havering

P0125.99.

161 Chippenham Road Harold Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 161 Chippenham Road Harold Hill Romford, received 3 Feb 2099 — approved on 9 Mar 2099 (delegated, Matt Gallagher).

Havering›Hilldene›P0125.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Mar 2099
5 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
0
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey rear extension

Reference
P0125.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2099
Validated
5 Feb 2099
Target date
31 Mar 2099
Decision date
9 Mar 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Permitted dev
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0125.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2099
Validated
5 Feb 2099
Target date
31 Mar 2099
Decision date
9 Mar 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Permitted dev
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Mar 2099, delegated decision by Matt Gallagher — 5 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 2099
Application received
5 Feb 2099
Application validated
31 Mar 2099
Statutory target date
9 Mar 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher
3 Feb 2099
Application received
5 Feb 2099
Application validated
31 Mar 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Mar 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.