Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Heaton ward›P0126.99
Planning application · Havering

P0126.99.

86 Grange Road Harold Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 86 Grange Road Harold Hill Romford, received 3 Feb 2099 — approved on 31 Mar 2099 (delegated, Matt Gallagher).

Havering›Heaton›P0126.99
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
31 Mar 2099
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
5
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Single storey front & rear extension

Reference
P0126.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2099
Validated
5 Feb 2099
Target date
31 Mar 2099
Decision date
31 Mar 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0126.99
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2099
Validated
5 Feb 2099
Target date
31 Mar 2099
Decision date
31 Mar 2099
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 31 Mar 2099, delegated decision by Matt Gallagher — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 2099
Application received
5 Feb 2099
Application validated
31 Mar 2099
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher
3 Feb 2099
Application received
5 Feb 2099
Application validated
31 Mar 2099
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
31 Mar 2099
Delegated decision: Approved · Matt Gallagher

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.