Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Gidea Park ward25 Park Drive Romford›P0131.97
Planning application · Havering

P0131.97.

25 Park Drive Romford

Full / Other Planning at 25 Park Drive Romford, received 3 Feb 2097 — refused on 1 Aug 2097 (delegated, Pauline Tillett).

Havering›Gidea Park›P0131.97
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Aug 2097
26 wks
Decision time
18 wks over the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retrospective permission for single storey rear extension

Reference
P0131.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2097
Validated
12 Feb 2097
Target date
31 Mar 2097
Decision date
1 Aug 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0131.97
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
3 Feb 2097
Validated
12 Feb 2097
Target date
31 Mar 2097
Decision date
1 Aug 2097
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Aug 2097, delegated decision by Pauline Tillett — 26 weeks from submission (18 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 2097
Application received
12 Feb 2097
Application validated
31 Mar 2097
Statutory target date
1 Aug 2097
Delegated decision: Refused · Pauline Tillett
3 Feb 2097
Application received
12 Feb 2097
Application validated
31 Mar 2097
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
1 Aug 2097
Delegated decision: Refused · Pauline Tillett

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.