Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringCranham wardP0155.21
Planning application · Havering

P0155.21.

98 Marlborough Gardens Upminster RM14 1SG

Full / Other Planning at 98 Marlborough Gardens Upminster RM14 1SG, received 29 Jan 2021 — refused on 26 Mar 2021 (delegated, Halima Chowdhury).

HaveringCranhamRM14 1SGP0155.21
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Mar 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Two storey side extension, new porch and front garage extension and loft conversion

Reference
P0155.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1SG
Council
Received
29 Jan 2021
Target date
26 Mar 2021
Decision date
26 Mar 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0155.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1SG
Council
Received
29 Jan 2021
Target date
26 Mar 2021
Decision date
26 Mar 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Supporting Document
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing
Drawing
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Supporting Document
Show all 7 rows
Supporting Document
Application Form
Drawing
Drawing

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 26 Mar 2021, delegated decision by Halima Chowdhury — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
29 Jan 2021
Application received
26 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Halima Chowdhury
29 Jan 2021
Application received
26 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
26 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Halima Chowdhury

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.