Planning application · Havering
P0168.24.
165-167 South Street Romford RM1 1PS
Full / Other Planning at 165-167 South Street Romford RM1 1PS, received 5 Feb 2024 — refused on 28 Mar 2024 (delegated, Jordan Campbell).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
28 Mar 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
1
Conditions
attached to the decision
5
Documents
5 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed powder coated aluminium canopy with retractable clear vinyl panels to form covered outside seating area
Reference
P0168.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 1PS
Ward
Council
Received
5 Feb 2024
Target date
1 Apr 2024
Decision date
28 Mar 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0168.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 1PS
Ward
Council
Received
5 Feb 2024
Target date
1 Apr 2024
Decision date
28 Mar 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 28 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Jordan Campbell — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
5 Feb 2024
Application received
1 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
28 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jordan Campbell
5 Feb 2024
Application received
1 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
28 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jordan Campbell
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The canopy and enclosed seating area would lack subservience to the host building and would
form a prominent feature in the street-scene, detrimental to the character of the subject
building and parade whilst also setting a harmful precedent through its permanence. It is
considered that the arrangement set out on submitted plans even when the roof and wall
panels are retracted would appear excessive and overbearing in scale, thus detrimental to the
aesthetic of the host premises, wider parade and consequently the wider street scene,
contrary to Policies 13, 14 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 as well as Paragraph
135 of the NPPF which requires development add to the overall quality of the area and be
sympathetic to local character and also setting a harmful precedent for other similar
development.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0168.24 - 28th March 2024 1 of 3
1
The canopy and enclosed seating area would lack subservience to the host building and would
form a prominent feature in the street-scene, detrimental to the character of the subject
building and parade whilst also setting a harmful precedent through its permanence. It is
considered that the arrangement set out on submitted plans even when the roof and wall
panels are retracted would appear excessive and overbearing in scale, thus detrimental to the
aesthetic of the host premises, wider parade and consequently the wider street scene,
contrary to Policies 13, 14 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 as well as Paragraph
135 of the NPPF which requires development add to the overall quality of the area and be
sympathetic to local character and also setting a harmful precedent for other similar
development.
HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0168.24 - 28th March 2024 1 of 3
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 13Havering Local Plan 14Havering Local Plan 26NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.