Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringMarshalls & Rise Pk wardP0179.24
Planning application · Havering

P0179.24.

3 Pettits Lane Romford RM1 4HL

Full / Other Planning at 3 Pettits Lane Romford RM1 4HL, received 7 Feb 2024 — refused on 3 Apr 2024 (delegated, Aidan Hughes).

HaveringMarshalls & Rise PkRM1 4HLP0179.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 Apr 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
3
Conditions
attached to the decision
7
Documents
7 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed amendment of previously approved scheme ref: P0378.22 to include demolition of existing single storey bungalow and erection of 2no. 5 Bedroom semi detached properties with associated car parking, cycle storage, refuse storage and amenity. Changes include using the loft space as habitable sp

Reference
P0179.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 4HL
Council
Received
7 Feb 2024
Target date
3 Apr 2024
Decision date
3 Apr 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0179.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
RM1 4HL
Council
Received
7 Feb 2024
Target date
3 Apr 2024
Decision date
3 Apr 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
3 Apr 2024
Decision Notice
3 Apr 2024
Application Form
8 Feb 2024
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024
Drawing
8 Feb 2024
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024
Decision Notice
3 Apr 2024
Decision Notice
3 Apr 2024
Application Form
8 Feb 2024
Show all 7 rows
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024
Drawing
8 Feb 2024
Supporting Document
8 Feb 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 Apr 2024, delegated decision by Aidan Hughes — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Feb 2024
Application received
3 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
3 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes
7 Feb 2024
Application received
3 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
3 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Aidan Hughes

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The cumulative impact of the hip to gable roof alteration and rear dormer window would be out of scale, be disproportionately large, overly prominent and relate unacceptably to the existing dwelling with a top heavy appearance which and would unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached pair and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the London Plan, NPPF and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
1
The cumulative impact of the hip to gable roof alteration and rear dormer window would be out of scale, be disproportionately large, overly prominent and relate unacceptably to the existing dwelling with a top heavy appearance which and would unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached pair and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the London Plan, NPPF and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 26D4NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.