Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Elm Park ward›P0213.02
Planning application · Havering

P0213.02.

18 Finucane Gardens Rainham

Full / Other Planning at 18 Finucane Gardens Rainham, received 13 Feb 2002 — approved on 28 Jan 2003 (delegated, Daniel Naude).

Havering›Elm Park›P0213.02
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
28 Jan 2003
50 wks
Decision time
42 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition and formation of larger garage

Reference
P0213.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
13 Feb 2002
Target date
10 Apr 2002
Decision date
28 Jan 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Reference
P0213.02
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 14 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
13 Feb 2002
Target date
10 Apr 2002
Decision date
28 Jan 2003
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 28 Jan 2003, delegated decision by Daniel Naude — 50 weeks from submission (42 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
13 Feb 2002
Application received
10 Apr 2002
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Daniel Naude
13 Feb 2002
Application received
10 Apr 2002
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2003
Delegated decision: Approved · Daniel Naude

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.