Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Havering›…Heaton ward1a Hillcrest Court Noak Hill Romford›P0225.11
Planning application · Havering

P0225.11.

1a Hillcrest Court Noak Hill Romford

Full / Other Planning at 1a Hillcrest Court Noak Hill Romford, received 15 Feb 2011 — approved on 12 Apr 2011 (delegated, Rick Younger).

Havering›Heaton›P0225.11
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
12 Apr 2011
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of flat roof with pitched roof

Reference
P0225.11
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
15 Feb 2011
Target date
12 Apr 2011
Decision date
12 Apr 2011
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P0225.11
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
15 Feb 2011
Target date
12 Apr 2011
Decision date
12 Apr 2011
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 12 Apr 2011, delegated decision by Rick Younger — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Feb 2011
Application received
12 Apr 2011
Statutory target date
12 Apr 2011
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger
15 Feb 2011
Application received
12 Apr 2011
Statutory target date
12 Apr 2011
Delegated decision: Approved · Rick Younger

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.