Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringCranham East wardP0268.98
Planning application · Havering

P0268.98.

111 Moor Lane Cranham

Full / Other Planning at 111 Moor Lane Cranham, received 5 Mar 2098 — approved on 31 Jul 2098 (delegated, Terry Hardwick).

HaveringCranham EastP0268.98
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
31 Jul 2098
21 wks
Decision time
13 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Roof extension with dormer windows to front and rear roofslopes

Reference
P0268.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Mar 2098
Validated
11 Mar 2098
Target date
30 Apr 2098
Decision date
31 Jul 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0268.98
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
5 Mar 2098
Validated
11 Mar 2098
Target date
30 Apr 2098
Decision date
31 Jul 2098
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 31 Jul 2098, delegated decision by Terry Hardwick — 21 weeks from submission (13 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Mar 2098
Application received
11 Mar 2098
Application validated
30 Apr 2098
Statutory target date
31 Jul 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Terry Hardwick
5 Mar 2098
Application received
11 Mar 2098
Application validated
30 Apr 2098
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
31 Jul 2098
Delegated decision: Approved · Terry Hardwick

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.