Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringHarold Wood wardP0287.21
Planning application · Havering

P0287.21.

Tomkyns Manor Tomkyns Lane Upminster RM14 1TP

Full / Other Planning at Tomkyns Manor Tomkyns Lane Upminster RM14 1TP, received 17 Feb 2021 — approved on 26 Apr 2021 (delegated, Cole Hodder).

HaveringHarold WoodRM14 1TPP0287.21
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Approved
Outcome
26 Apr 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
4
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Proposed driveway entrance gate.

Reference
P0287.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1TP
Council
Received
17 Feb 2021
Target date
26 Apr 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0287.21
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM14 1TP
Council
Received
17 Feb 2021
Target date
26 Apr 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2021
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Apprv with cons Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Supporting Document
Drawing
Application Form
Decision Notice
Decision Notice
Drawing
Show all 6 rows
Supporting Document
Drawing
Application Form

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 26 Apr 2021, delegated decision by Cole Hodder — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Feb 2021
Application received
26 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
26 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Approved · Cole Hodder
17 Feb 2021
Application received
26 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
26 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Approved · Cole Hodder

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.