Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHaveringGooshays wardP0333.24
Planning application · Havering

P0333.24.

7 Preston Road Romford RM3 7YU

Full / Other Planning at 7 Preston Road Romford RM3 7YU, received 6 Mar 2024 — refused on 5 Jun 2024 (delegated, Louise Jarrett).

HaveringGooshaysRM3 7YUP0333.24
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHavering profile →
Refused
Outcome
5 Jun 2024
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
2
Conditions
attached to the decision
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Havering planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Loft Conversion

Reference
P0333.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 7YU
Council
Received
6 Mar 2024
Validated
10 Apr 2024
Target date
5 Jun 2024
Decision date
5 Jun 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Reference
P0333.24
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
RM3 7YU
Council
Received
6 Mar 2024
Validated
10 Apr 2024
Target date
5 Jun 2024
Decision date
5 Jun 2024
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Refuse Conditions/Reasons
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Officer Report
11 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
5 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
5 Jun 2024
Supporting Document
11 Apr 2024
Drawing
7 Mar 2024
Application Form
7 Mar 2024
Officer Report
11 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
5 Jun 2024
Decision Notice
5 Jun 2024
Show all 6 rows
Supporting Document
11 Apr 2024
Drawing
7 Mar 2024
Application Form
7 Mar 2024

Documents open on the Havering portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 5 Jun 2024, delegated decision by Louise Jarrett — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Mar 2024
Application received
10 Apr 2024
Application validated
5 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
5 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett
6 Mar 2024
Application received
10 Apr 2024
Application validated
5 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
5 Jun 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed front and rear dormer windows would, by reason of their excessive width, bulk and scale, be visually intrusive and would appear as an incongruous addition to the original building, resulting in a dominant and visually intrusive feature that is out of keeping with the scale and character of the existing building and wider area, detrimental to the visual amenity of the streetscene and rear garden environment, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0333.24 - 5th June 2024 1 of 4
1
The proposed front and rear dormer windows would, by reason of their excessive width, bulk and scale, be visually intrusive and would appear as an incongruous addition to the original building, resulting in a dominant and visually intrusive feature that is out of keeping with the scale and character of the existing building and wider area, detrimental to the visual amenity of the streetscene and rear garden environment, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021. HAVPDECR (ODB Jan 2022) P0333.24 - 5th June 2024 1 of 4
Policies cited
Havering Local Plan 7Havering Local Plan 26

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.